Tuesday, 10 March 2026

Court strikes out Aiteo’s preliminary objection in N122b Opu Nembe oil spill suit



The Federal High Court sitting in Yenagoa, Bayelsa on Tuesday struck out a preliminary objection filed by Aiteo in a suit instituted by the Opu Nembe Kingdom over oil spills that impacted the community.


The objection was brought by the company on the grounds that the community had misspelled its name in the suit as Aiteo Eastern Exploration and Production Company Ltd instead of Aiteo Eastern E & P Company Ltd.


Shell Petroleum Development Company had in 2015 sold its OML 29 oil bloc to Aiteo, which currently operates in the area covering Opu Nembe and the neighbouring Otuabagi community where the legacy Oloibiri oil wells are located.


The suit arises from three oil spills, two that occurred in September and October 2019 along the Botokiri axis of theNembe Creek Trunk Line and at the Santa Barbara Well 1 respectively, and another in May 2020 at Well 9 in the Odeama Creek Oil Field, all of which the community says heavily impacted the environment and led to loss of livelihoods, amongst other damages.


Consequently, on August 15, 2024, the Opu Nembe Kingdom, through King Iyerite Chiefson Awululu Atubu, Chief Dr. Ikaonaworio Eferebo-Igoma, Chief Dr. Markson Amaegbe-Tamuno and Mr. Doibo Evans, approached the court seeking environmental justice and remediation.


In the suit marked FHC/YN/CS/284/2024, the community, through its lead counsel, Mr. Iniruo Wills of Ntephe Smith and Wills, is asking the court, among other reliefs, to declare that the massive spills resulted from operational failure and negligence by the oil company.


Delivering his ruling Justice Emmanuel Ayo upheld the plaintiffs’ responses to the notice of preliminary objection and consequently struck out the objection filed by the defendant.


The court held that it could not allow technicalities to defeat the substance of the suit, especially as the plaintiffs had already filed a motion seeking to regularize the defendant’s name.


The matter was subsequently adjourned to April 16, 2026 for ruling on the motion seeking amendment of the defen

dant’s name. 



  


No comments:

Post a Comment